Today my students were learning about Pi, its origins and its irrationality. We used this handy website to look up things like the date, and our birthdays to see where, in the first 200 million digits of pi, they resided. It helped us visualise what it means to have infinite digits (as much as one can).
Someone came up with the idea of looking at the distribution of each digit 0-9 within the first 200 million digits to see if there were any interesting patterns. Disappointingly, the only pattern is that they are roughly evenly distributed. But that didn’t stop us making a Pi Pie Chart… even though I hate pie charts, I made an exception because punny.
So proving the area formula for a trapezium is turning into something I do when I get bored. Here is my third proof. This one requires two versions annoyingly, as I mapped out all the different types of trapezium I could think of (are there more??)
Type 1 has a base that exceeds the top in width, both to the left and right. Type 2 and type 3 differ only in that type 2 has a top right vertex in line with the bottom left vertex, whereas type 3 does not. Type 4 has a base and top completely unaligned, and type 5 has two right angles.
I needed a slightly different proof for type 1. Or perhaps I’m just missing something so that I can combine these two proofs nicely without writing a completely different one? Seems likely.
Anyway, it’s a simple premise: enclose the shape in the smallest possible rectangle, and show that the area of the trapezium is equal to the area of the rectangle minus the remaining triangle(s). If you play with the algebra a little, you end up with the formula we’re all familiar with. I think with the added arrows it’s pretty clear where everything comes from, albeit a little messy.
Here are a pair of relative frequency worksheets I use when teaching probability. The second one involves various practicals that require no particular resources to bring in beforehand.