These are great for teaching algebraic inequalities in a different way.

via LostInRecursion

*Edit, since scheduling this post, Don Steward has also posted his version of the same sorts of problem

Advertisements

These are great for teaching algebraic inequalities in a different way.

via LostInRecursion

*Edit, since scheduling this post, Don Steward has also posted his version of the same sorts of problem

Advertisements

%d bloggers like this:

I’m not sure I understand. What are you supposed to do? Do you need to account for moments, or is is just weights? If the latter, and I assume the symbols mean the weight is the same, then surely the second only works is square = triangle?

You order each shape by weight. So for puzzle 9 (second pictured), you’d get:

Cir > Tri + Squ

and

Cir + Tri + Squ > Cir + 2 Tri

Which would lead to Cir > Squ > Tri

For example, if Cir = 4kg, Squ = 2 Kg and Tri = 1 Kg, then it would look as pictured – but you don’t need to attribute a real weight to each symbol, just which weighs more / less.

A full explanation from the puzzle writer is here:

http://lostinrecursion.wordpress.com/

Pingback: Pose a Puzzle | Solve My Maths